Months after the transfer of Idris Okuneye, better known as Bobrisky, from the Medium Security Custodial Centre (MSCC) in Kirikiri, Lagos, new details have emerged regarding the rationale behind this controversial move. Michael Anugwa, the Deputy Controller of Corrections overseeing the MSCC, revealed that Bobrisky was moved to the Maximum Security Custodial Centre due to concerns about his physical features, which include noticeable female characteristics such as breasts.
The transfer came to light during a session with the House of Representatives Committees on Financial Crimes and Reformatory Institutions, which was investigating allegations of a 15 million Naira bribery linked to the well-known cross-dresser. Anugwa explained that the facility’s Admission Board convened to discuss Bobrisky’s situation and concluded that protective custody was necessary for his safety.
Safety Concerns and Special Arrangements
Anugwa emphasized that Bobrisky’s unique features could expose him to potential harm from other inmates. “Though male, he possesses particular features that complicate his placement in a regular facility,” he stated. The board’s decision to place him in protective custody was framed as being consistent with international best practices for inmate safety.
In addition to his transfer, it was noted that Bobrisky had requested special dietary arrangements after refusing standard prison meals. This request was accommodated under legal provisions allowing inmates to have food brought in by designated individuals.
Ongoing Investigations
As investigations into the bribery allegations and Bobrisky’s treatment within the correctional system progressed, it became clear that he had provided testimony and evidence regarding his experiences in custody. The House of Representatives has continued to mandate inquiries into these serious claims.
This incident has sparked widespread discussion about the treatment of high-profile inmates within Nigeria’s correctional facilities. Many critics are questioning whether preferential treatment exists for certain individuals and are calling for greater transparency and accountability within the system.
Conclusion
Bobrisky’s transfer to a Maximum Security facility raises important questions about inmate safety and the integrity of Nigeria’s correctional practices. As authorities continue to investigate this case, it is crucial for all parties involved to uphold justice and ensure that no inmate faces undue risk or mistreatment while serving their sentence. The outcome of these inquiries could have significant implications for the future of Nigeria’s correctional system.
